September 21, 2005
{...}As I sat there in the U.S. Supreme Court back in February and listened to the justices hear my case, I was so disappointed their very first question and first concern was for the power of government rather than the rights of citizens.In many ways, my neighbors and I are the victims of legislators, lawyers and judges who believe it is somehow a sign of intelligence to make language that clearly means one thing mean something exactly the opposite: "Public use" now means private use; judges don't judge but instead let legislators decide whether they're violating the Constitution. There is nothing intelligent about misusing language in this way to take away people's homes and their rights.
What is happening to me should not happen to anyone else. Congress and state legislatures need to send a message to local governments that this kind of abuse of power not only won't be funded, it won't be tolerated.
Special interests -- developers and governments that benefit from this use of power --are working to convince the public there is no problem, but I am living proof there is. {...}
Go read the whole thing.
{Hat tip: Fausta}
Posted by: Kathy at
09:41 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Fausta at September 21, 2005 01:38 PM (VBeTQ)
50 queries taking 0.0545 seconds, 109 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.