Well, according to my limited knowledge, the Information Technology business is back. Some bean counter in a cubicle housed in deepest, darkest Silicon Valley might disagree, but hey...I don't go in for accounting. (Basically because I can't freakin' add or subtract, but that's really beside the point.) Rather, I go in for anecdotal evidence! Because we all know how objective I am.

Kathy the Cake Eater: Cub Reporter---providing half-assed analysis and subjective observations since 2003!

Tonight the husband and I attended a launch party for a new ISP here in the Cities. There was free food. There was free booze. I should find out tomorrow if I won one of three ipods they're giving away. And this was after the husband attended another meet and greet on Wednesday night, hosted by another IT company, at another restaurant with free food and free booze. No ipod door prizes, but they also didn't restrict the bar to beer only, either, like they did tonight.

I love IT gatherings. When I go to these things, I'm generally just tagging along, hence my social responsibilities are at an all-time-low. The husband is there to conduct business, to meet people, etc. He's got an agenda. I'm just there to people watch. And believe me, these gatherings do provide excellent people watching.

If you're interested in all of this, read on after the jump. more...

Posted by: Kathy at 12:21 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1109 words, total size 6 kb.

I don't read LaShawn Barber's blog hardly at all, but courtesy o' Fausta, I happened to catch her appearance on MSNBC's Connected Coast to Coast. I thought she did rather well, on the whole, particularly considering it was her first time on tee-vee. Now, nothing that was said on this broadcast was of particular interest to me. It was the same ol' same ol' that makes cable news network talk shows particularly boring. Yet there was one notable exception.

Monica Crowley called female bloggers "blogettes."

There's no transcript that I can find of the show, because apparently if your show on MSNBC is aired before 7p.m. EST, they don't deem it worthy of transcript-status, but this is what I heard. I wrote it down. You can follow the video link at Fausta's and see for yourself.

This is what I would have said to Crowley, had I been the one in the chair. This is also why I will never be allowed on tee-vee.

"Blogettes?

Ahem.

I think not, chica.

Don't you dare try to cutesy-up my title and differentiate me from the rest of the bloggers because I have a pair of breasts and a vagina. Particularly when it seems you, like the rest of the mainstream media, have no freakin' clue about what blogs are, let alone who writes them. Let me guess where this gender-equity segment came from. You read about Susan Estrich taking on Mike Kinsley about the dearth of female op-ed writers. Then you, in an effort to make your show more hip and wordly, try and apply this to the blogosphere, because that's all that everyone's talking about! Conveniently, Kevin Drum writes one poorly researched piece asking "where are the female bloggers?" and you, somehow---because I'm not really sure you can operate a computer let alone surf blogs---catch wind of it. Suddenly you and Ronnie Junior know enough about the subject to make it a topic on a show so obscure even I hadn't heard about it, but you're also going to try score some brownie points in the blogosphere you know nothing about (because, of course, you know how viral marketing works and if we can get some free pr in the blogosphere, well, damn the torpedos! We'll do it!) and coin the phrase blogettes?

Again, I think not.

Let me take a wild stab here and say that the idea for "blogettes" is derived from "Wonkette"? That's really original, kids. Wow. Let's place a little gold star right smack in the middle of your foreheads because you're so creative. The movie people should be calling any minute now to option your story.

I will only say this once, so pay attention and get it right the first time.

I am not a "blogette." I am a "blogger." Got it? I may not want to be spayed anymore than a cat does, but neither do I want to be "set apart" with a cutesy title that is so not what I am about. First and foremost I am a writer. That the content that makes up The Cake Eater Chronicles comes from a female shouldn't have anything to do with the validity of the opinions presented. They either have merit or they do not. It's quite simple. The blogosphere is all about ideas and opinions. It's a veritable smorgasbord. There's something for everyone. The sex of the author shouldn't come into the equation unless we're talking about things directly related to our sex---like tampons or jock straps. To miss this point is to miss the exact essence of the blogosphere. And the internet, for that matter.

I am not going to participate in some gender-equity program in the blogosphere, nor will I allow myself to be labeled with some girly-girl term because you, in your vast and all-encompassing wisdom, needed a topic to fill time on your cable news chat show and this seemed as good as any other.

Piss off."

See? No one would ever allow me to be on tee-vee because I won't stand for the condescending bullshit that doubles for content on a cable news show.

Posted by: Kathy at 11:53 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 712 words, total size 4 kb.

My blog kid has been busy redecorating. I think it looks marvelous.

Go on over and check it out.

Posted by: Kathy at 08:31 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.

If you've got some, send them Grandpa H.'s way. He's the husband's grandfather and he's undergoing colon cancer surgery this morning. Thanks!

I'll update when I know something.

UPDATE: Thanks for the happy thoughts. They worked.

Grandpa made it through the surgery with flying colors. He's a bit doped up on the fruit of the poppy right now---he actually asked the recovery room nurse when he was going into surgery---but he's off the oxygen and is doing fine. They think they got it all, but they have to check out the stuff they gathered from the lymph nodes to make sure. If that's clear, no chemo. So, keep your fingers crossed.

Thanks again!

Posted by: Kathy at 09:41 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.

Have you seen the cutesy ads for CNN? You know, the ones where Anderson Cooper reads the weather or Christiane Ampanpour lectures some clueless chick about Iran and Iraq? Yeah, I thought so. Anyway, if Christiane Ampanpour can have her "bugaboos" about pronouncing said respective countries as Eye-raq and Eye-ran, I can have my own bugaboo with one particular aspect of blogosphere grammar. And that bugaboo would be homonymns. You remember what homonyms are, right? Words that sound alike---they might even be spelled the same---but have different meanings. Well, these pesky little things are my bugaboos.

There are a lot of really great writers in the blogosphere, so it really grieves me when I see these itsy-bitsy boo-boos. Yet, I can't be too hard on my fellow bloggers. Posting isn't easy. I simply think most people are hampered by too little time to get a post up and forget all about it. Also, if they're using a grammar checker, well, that might lead to a few problems. I know for a fact that you cannot trust Microsquash Word's grammar checker when it comes to homonyms. I've lots of little green lines highlighting homonyms in the manuscript that I know are correct, but Microsquash---in its evil "I must be right all of the damn time" way---stubbornly insists that they're not. To put it simply: don't trust anybody's grammar checker to get it right.

Now, I'm not particularly picky about grammar in general, because I'll be the first to admit I suck at it. Grammar is not generally something I perfect the first time around. I have to edit, and even then I miss a good deal. So, split an infinitive for all I care. Dangle that participle. Let your agreement disagree. I don't really care. What I do care about, what stops me dead in my tracks and makes me sigh (particularly when I'm reading a great essay) is when someone confuses simple homonyms. It drives me insane!

So, since we know everyone and their brother is concerned about my sanity, well, let's go over some that I see on a regular basis.

• They're/Their/There

"They're" is a contraction for "they are"
"Their" is a possessive pronoun
"There" is a place or position
• You're/Your

"You're" is a contraction of "you are"
"Your" is the possessive form of "you"
• Loose/Lose

"Loose" is an adjective that means "free, not securely attached."
"Lose" is a verb that means "to fail to keep, to be deprived of."
• Whose/Who's

"Whose" is the possessive form of "who"
"Who's" is a contraction for "who is"
• Affect/Effect

"Affect" is a verb that means to "exert influence"
"Effect" as a verb means "to accomplish"; as a noun it means "a result."

Ok, so now that I have successfully pissed off plenty of bloggers by criticizing their writing, feel free to use the comments to add your own grammar bugaboos. My ass is wide enough to provide a target for all the ire that will undoubtedly come my way. I'll shield you.

Posted by: Kathy at 11:46 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 502 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Your totally, write, of course. When I see bloggers making these mistakes I can't help but think, "Gee, their such a buncha loosers!" Then again, it's probably just an example of the affects of today's education system so whose to say there too blame, huh? ;-)

Posted by: zonker at March 02, 2005 06:22 PM (RU/xX)

2 wiseass

Posted by: Kathy at March 02, 2005 06:28 PM (Tosbv)

3 Baited breath (gee, I've just been eating minnows!); hoards of people (you never know when you might run out!). Here! Here! (not there! not there!).... meh, that's all for now.

Posted by: Adrianne Truett at March 02, 2005 09:17 PM (MEXzq)

4 And it frustrates me that at least some editions of MS Word are of the opinion that "effect" cannot be a verb and "it's" can never have an apostrophe.

Posted by: Adrianne Truett at March 02, 2005 09:18 PM (MEXzq)

5 Not sure if it counts as a homonym, but the it's/its misuse really peeves me too ("it's" is NOT the possessive of "it," "its" is. "It's" is a contraction of "it is"). Grr. That was fun to type, with all those little 2-and-3-point Scrabble words.

Posted by: JohnL at March 03, 2005 12:55 PM (Hs4rn)

6 How about (not exactly homonyms) -- 1) envelop vs. envelope 2) breath vs. breathe 3) taut vs. taunt (aaaaaagh!) Oh, and I know there are some more -several more! - but I can't think of them now!

Posted by: Romeocat at March 03, 2005 10:04 PM (lVOFk)

7 Just think how much worse it would be if the agrammatical didn't have MS Grammar Check to begin with! And how much easier your own life will be when you go into the Options menu and turn the fricking Grammar Check-thing off entirely.

Posted by: John at March 03, 2005 10:27 PM (IuAUA)

8 I am a great sinner in this respect... To totally change the topic though: I always used the word "homonym" the way you have used it here. I remember reciting definitions while I was in third grade or so to the effect, "sounds alike but spelled different." Then I went to TOESL hell to teach something I'm not exactly good at abroad. Let's not stroll down that memory lane, but they said that "homonym" means a word that has the same spelling, but a different meaning. "homophone" was the word I was defining. I had never heard that before and made kind of an ass out of myself arguing this point. So now I am confused. OR is this another damn British English/American English thing

Posted by: Jedno at March 07, 2005 12:39 PM (7FRUW)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

If the Maximum Leader thinks this is even remotely impressive, he's deluded.

Posted by: Kathy at 10:32 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.

We've got another House convert!

Posted by: Kathy at 10:10 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 7 words, total size 1 kb.

What Michele said.

Mother of God, please grant us tort reform. Soon.

Posted by: Kathy at 05:54 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.

Fausta's on one. She's finally feeling better and is on a tear.

Go on over and just keep scrolling.

Posted by: Kathy at 02:00 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.

When Mr. H. was over here for the Oscar Party the other night, he left half a bottle of Dr. Pepper behind.

I just took a swig, and dang is about all I can say. Too sweet. Too syrupy. Bleech.

I gave up drinking soda a while back. I used to consume cokes on a regular basis, then I switched over to diet. I gave up the diet about a year ago because---{insert the lyrics to "You're So Vain" here}---it's loaded with sodium, which in turn makes me retain water. Kathy no like being bloated, so while it was a struggle and a half, she gave the junk up.

It's always wierd, though, now to take a drink of this stuff. No longer can I understand how people drink this junk all day long. Caffeine for non-coffee drinkers is one thing, but all the sugar that comes with this? (And this is coming from a person who likes everything sweet, too.) I simply cannot comprehend how I used to be one of the number of people who guzzled the stuff. It's beyond me.

Posted by: Kathy at 12:39 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 185 words, total size 1 kb.