January 31, 2006
"The White House Cookbook": Health Suggestions, Part Five
All sorts of helpful hints in regards to health after the jump.
{Parts one, two, three and four}
more...
Posted by: Kathy at
10:10 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1130 words, total size 7 kb.
Lock 'Em Up
No, I'm not talking about illegal immigrants or criminals, but rather today's teenagers. And when I say "lock them up" the girls get locked in a convent and the boys gets stuck with a bunch of liquored up Jesuits who are determined to grill them for four years about the use of the past pluperfect in Latin.
Because, when they're left to their own devices, well....
{...}Alair is headed for the section of the second-floor hallway where her friends gather every day during their free tenth period for the “cuddle puddle,” as she calls it. There are girls petting girls and girls petting guys and guys petting guys. She dives into the undulating heap of backpacks and blue jeans and emerges between her two best friends, Jane and Elle, whose names have been changed at their request. They are all 16, juniors at Stuyvesant. Alair slips into Jane’s lap, and Elle reclines next to them, watching, cat-eyed. All three have hooked up with each other. All three have hooked up with boys—sometimes the same boys. But it’s not that they’re gay or bisexual, not exactly. Not always.
Their friend Nathan, a senior with John Lennon hair and glasses, is there with his guitar, strumming softly under the conversation. “So many of the girls here are lesbian or have experimented or are confused,” he says.
Ilia, another senior boy, frowns at Nathan’s use of labels. “It’s not lesbian or bisexual. It’s just, whatever . . . ”
Since the school day is winding down, things in the hallway are starting to get rowdy. Jane disappears for a while and comes back carrying a pint-size girl over her shoulder. “Now I take her off and we have gay sex!” she says gleefully, as she parades back and forth in front of the cuddle puddle. “And it’s awesome!” The hijacked girl hangs limply, a smile creeping to her lips. Ilia has stuffed papers up the front of his shirt and prances around on tiptoe, batting his eyes and sticking out his chest. Elle is watching, enthralled, as two boys lock lips across the hall. “Oh, my,” she murmurs. “Homoerotica. There’s nothing more exciting than watching two men make out.” And everyone is talking to another girl in the puddle who just “came out,” meaning she announced that she’s now open to sexual overtures from both boys and girls, which makes her a minor celebrity, for a little while.
When asked how many of her female friends have had same-sex experiences, Alair answers, “All of them.” Then she stops to think about it. “All right, maybe 80 percent. At least 80 percent of them have experimented. And they still are. It’s either to please a man, or to try it out, or just to be fun, or ’cause you’re bored, or just ’cause you like it . . . whatever.”
With teenagers there is always a fair amount of posturing when it comes to sex, a tendency to exaggerate or trivialize, innocence mixed with swagger. It’s also true that the “puddle” is just one clique at Stuyvesant, and that Stuyvesant can hardly be considered a typical high school. It attracts the brightest public-school students in New York, and that may be an environment conducive to fewer sexual inhibitions. “In our school,” Elle says, “people are getting a better education, so they’re more open-minded.” {...}
Read the whole thing. It gets worse/better. Depending upon how you view things.
There are times when I feel more like Methuselah rather than the thirty-five-year old that I am. This would be one of those times.
Posted by: Kathy at
09:43 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 603 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Hmm....think they'll have enough hands and toes to count up their sexually transmitted diseases by the time they are 21?
Posted by: Arielle at February 01, 2006 11:44 AM (ZnGgh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 30, 2006
"The White House Cookbook": Health Sugestions, Part Four
More incorrect health advice---including remedies for lockjaw and the
New York Sun's cholera mixture---after the jump.
{Parts one, two and three}
more...
Posted by: Kathy at
10:20 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 2400 words, total size 15 kb.
1
Tinctures of cayenne, opium & rhubarb, essence of peppermint, and spirits of camphor -- now if anything will prevent cholera, that oughta do it. (Call me over-vigilant if you must, but do I believe that mixing this potion in water that's void of any fecal matter might be another reasonable precaution.)
Posted by: Bob at January 31, 2006 11:24 AM (yMzz+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
It's Time to Play "Who Said It?"
Are you ready to play, boys and girls? All righty then. Who said,
"You, American mother, if the Pentagon calls to tell you that your son is coming home in a coffin, then remember George Bush. And you, British wife, if the Defense Department calls you to say that your husband is returning crippled and burnt, remember Tony Blair."
Eh?
Was it leading anti-war activist, Cindy Sheehan?
Was it Daily Kos?
Was it Congressman John Murtha?
Was it Senators Kerry or Rodham Clinton?
Nope. It's none of those. It's {insert drumroll here}...AYMAN AL-ZAWAHIRI!, CURRENT #2 IN AL-QAEDA!
When your rhetoric comes out sounding exactly like that of an Egyptian nutjob terrorist, you might want to rethink how you word things.
Posted by: Kathy at
01:10 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 134 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Doug at January 30, 2006 09:58 PM (7P5xE)
2
Saw a bumper sticker this morning that read "Voldemort Votes Republican." Of course, Voldemort would vote Democrat. The Democrats want to give Felons in prison the vote, they want to coddle criminals, and their rhetoric is the same as Osama and Zawahiri.
Posted by: WitNit at January 31, 2006 11:59 AM (m7Be4)
3
My guess was Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, Johns Kerry, Murtha and Edwards, Teds Kennedy and Rall, George Soros, that Al Kaeda guy everyone keeps talking about ...........
;o)>
Posted by: Mark at February 04, 2006 08:59 PM (S8Ve4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
They Say It's Your Birthday, Redux
Well, since it was
Robbo's birthday last week, a few of us decided that if
Build-A-Bear was a good enough venue for Llama-ette #2's Birthday party, well, it sure as heck was good enough for her dear old dad.
Not really needing a teddy bear (I'm more of a muppet girl, myself), I was inspired to build Robbo a bear he'd like. So I built him a Lord Nelson Bear.
But I have to say, Lord Nelson is a wee bit boring to look at, isn't he?
So, I jazzed him up a wee bit. (You can call this the "Steve-O Syndrome" if you must.)
I make no claims regarding the historical accuracy. Besides, I'm sure Robbo will correct me. Even if I'm not wrong.
When I finished making the bear, I was walking past the birthday boy and I looked over to see what he and Steve-o were up to. I couldn't quite believe my eyes. It's quite shocking, so, OF COURSE, I took a picture.
Like that's going to score them some French tail. Try again, boys! Heh.
The Cranky Neocon, Phin and Sadie were also at the party. Go and check out what they built!
Posted by: Kathy at
09:02 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 210 words, total size 2 kb.
1
OH YES. It really IS build-a-bear hell. Hee hee!
Posted by: sadie at January 30, 2006 12:45 PM (xV63t)
2
I'd like to point out for the record that I'm the bear in the fringe coat, not the one with the scarf.
Posted by: Steve the LLamabutcher at January 30, 2006 02:05 PM (c5Jw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2006
Rich
As in, "
That is..."
{...}SPIELBERG: I think we all have been given our marching orders ... Maybe I shouldn't get into this. [Pause] I just feel that filmmakers are much more proactive since the second Bush administration. I think that everybody is trying to declare their independence and state their case for the things that we believe in. No one is really representing us, so we're now representing our own feelings, and we're trying to strike back.
So Bush has been good for film?
SPIELBERG: I wouldn't just say Bush. The whole neo-conservative movement.
CLOONEY: Because it's polarizing. I'm not going to sit up and say, "This is how you should think." But let's at least acknowledge that there should be an open debate, and not be told that it's unpatriotic to ask questions. Steven, you're taking it from all sides right now.
SPIELBERG: [Laughs] I feel wildly popular.
Did you expect the political reaction to "Munich" to be this heated?
SPIELBERG: I knew we were going to receive a volley from the right. I was surprised that we received a much smaller, but no less painful, volley from the left. It made me feel a little more aware of the dogma, and the Luddite position people take any time the Middle East is up for discussion.
So many fundamentalists in my own community, the Jewish community, have grown very angry at me for allowing the Palestinians simply to have dialogue and for allowing Tony Kushner to be the author of that dialogue. "Munich" never once attacks Israel, and barely criticizes Israel's policy of counterviolence against violence. It simply asks a plethora of questions. It's the most questioning story I've ever had the honor to tell. For that, we were accused of the sin of moral equivocation. Which, of course, we didn't intend—and we're not guilty of.{...}
See, here's the thing. I like Spielberg. I like Spielberg's movies. I think, on the whole, he's a decent man. And he made Schindler's List which is a movie I can only watch on rare occasions because it moves me to explore the wells of sympathy that I know I possess yet rarely like to plumb because it's painful to do so. He's a man who, most would think, is on the right side of the moral equation. He knows right from wrong. He knows how to tell an entertaining story, and no one can deny that he's been very successful at telling tales, but...
...when I read that these words, "I just feel that filmmakers are much more proactive since the second Bush administration. I think that everybody is trying to declare their independence and state their case for the things that we believe in. No one is really representing us, so we're now representing our own feelings, and we're trying to strike back." came from his mouth, I don't exactly feel sympathetic, ya dig? Poor widdle Stevie Spielberg is feeling disenfranchised. He's not feeling "represented." So he's, "striking back."
Fight the powers that be!
/channelling Public Enemy
Forgive me while I bend over and laugh myself silly.
It's absurd. Ludicrous. And any other number of adjectives that describe how just plain dumb it is that Spielberg thinks he's disenfranchised. That he's not being represented, that he has to fight to get his ideas out there to beat back the awful phenomenon that is neo-conservatism, even if it appears he's using The Guardian's lax, imprecise, and boogeyman-ish definition of that particular school of international relations theory. He would have us believe he's just one more Ordinary Joe fighting the powers that be.
Well, Stevie, really. Sell your crazy elsewhere, we're all stocked up here.
This man could get a hangnail. If he wanted to, he could publicize the fact that he had a hangnail, and everyone in the world would pay attention. CNN would run stories on Spielberg's hangnail, and would bring on doctors to discuss what would happen should said hangnail become infected. The pundity-doctors would then go on to discuss whether neosporin should be used to clear up his infected hangnail, or if he should just expose it to air and let nature take its course. I could go on, but I think you get the picture, eh, my devoted Cake Eater Readers.
Spielberg has clout. He has it in Hollywood. He has it everywhere in the world. He has it because, ahem, he's earned it. He's worked hard to make his mark, and he's done precisely that. And yet, for some strange reason, he wants us to believe that's not the case. That's he just one more disaffected, early-21st Century Dude who has no say in the way things are run.
No, Stevie. I dont have a say in the way things are run. You, Stevie, are the establishment. There's a bit of a difference. Learn it, please. You're making a fool of yourself.
Posted by: Kathy at
11:13 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 815 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Very well put. I read that article earlier and said, "say what?" I just don't get him. He seems like a decent man, someone I quite admired, and like you said, he made Schindler's List, and yet, he seems out of touch. Maybe that's a byproduct of being stinking rich and powerful. I dunno.
Posted by: Ith at January 29, 2006 11:38 PM (sCBe0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 27, 2006
"The White House Cookbook": Health Suggestions, Part Two
More deliciously incorrect health advice after the jump.
{Part One}
more...
Posted by: Kathy at
11:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1244 words, total size 8 kb.
Ummmm
Sorry about the lack of blogging, but it's---ahem--FORTY-FIVE FREAKIN' DEGREES.
That might not sound very warm to you people south of the Mason-Dixon line, but it's a veritable heat wave here in Minnesota.
It's sunny as well.
And the snow is melting.
The husband also has a Churchill to smoke.
So, as you might guess, I'm ghandi for the rest of the day.
Posted by: Kathy at
01:33 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
January 26, 2006
So You've Won The Election
Now govern.
I hate to say it because, undoubtedly, someone will take it the wrong way, but I honestly think this is a great outcome for the future of Israel and the Palestinian People. This could be the move that will bring peace to the region. I don't say this because I believe Hamas is going to be a great political force for good, but rather because I know they will fail the Palestinian people. They have no experience governing. They don't know what it takes and they'll undoubtedly fail, just like their terrorist predecessor, Yassir Arafat, failed. Convincing poor, downtrodden young men who have no future before them (mainly because of Hamas' actions) to blow themselves up is nothing compared to actually having to govern.
The question is how will the Palestinian People react when Hamas fails to bring them a better life? Will they revert to their Arafat-inspired codependence of conspiracy theories galore or will they, for once, open their eyes and see that Hamas and every other terrorist organization, not to mention every Arab nation state, uses the Palestinians for their political purposes and that, perhaps, it's time for them to step up and stop themselves from being used? If the Palestinians take the latter option, the election of Hamas---and the turmoil it will unbdoubtedly bring for the Israelis---might actually be worth it in the long term if it convinces the Palestinians to stop giving credence to what these terrorists say and brings about an era where peace will actually stick.
Posted by: Kathy at
09:09 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 264 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Good news: the outright theft of foreign aid money might be cut somewhat with the takeover of the Palestinian government by Hamas, which would leave more money for schools, parks, and education for Palestinian children.
Bad news: the kids won't be around to enjoy these new amenities after Hamas straps bomb belts to them and sends them into Israel to kill JOOOOOOS.
I say it's a case of the "meet the new boss, same as the old boss" principle in action.
Posted by: Russ from Winterset at January 26, 2006 01:18 PM (wZLWV)
2
I hate to bring this up, but you said similar things when Abu Mazen came into power.
It is already very clear what the palestinians want, they elected hamas because hamas has promised to destroy Israel.
Look at what they have done in Gaza, they destroyed everything, and it is a lawless place full of murder and mayhem.
What you suggest is impossible because no matter how horrible their lives become under hamas, they will be told and they will always believe that their sorrows are caused by the Jews. They will never hold hamas accountable for their troubles, nor will they hold themselves accountable for their troubles. No matter how bad it becomes, they will just blame the Jews and they will always seek to destroy Israel.
And if they succeed, they will then seek to destroy America. This is their stated goal. But the world does not listen to what they say, unless they are complaining about what the Jews have done to them.
Why?
Posted by: LindaSoG at January 26, 2006 07:42 PM (IgAoC)
3
Linda:
1. Forgive me if this sounds a bit incredulous and condescending, but why on God's green earth do you insist on calling Abbas "Abu Mazen"? You do realize that by calling him that you are honoring him, don't you? I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude, it's just that "Abu Mazen" is not something I'd
ever call Abbas. He doesn't have my respect. He obviously doesn't have yours. Why do you call him that?
2. Here's a link to
the post that you mentioned.
I stick by my comments today. I stick by my comments from a year ago.
Do you stick by your comments from a year ago, Linda?
I call things like I see them. Obviously I would have preferred a different electoral outcome. So would most reasonable people. But this is what you have before you: Hamas has been elected to
govern. Do you think they'll have much luck with that, you know, what with all the experience that they have at it? {/sarcasm} Do you think they'll know how to appropriate funds to fix roads and build schools? Do you honestly think that the Palestinian people put them in office only to blow up Jews? Or do you think they think that Hamas is one of the few groups who actually manages to get things done, and since our choices are so shitty, why not? Because, let's face it, Hamas is pretty damn good at handing out the payola to get stupid young kids to blow themselves up for the greater glory of Allah. They've also, it appears, have the green hat and banner markets cornered, but this all means one thing: they manage to get things done. No, they're not good things, of course, but it is progress of a sort. This is why, I believe, Hamas was elected: because Palestinians think they can get something done. Now they actually have to back that up. They've just been handed the rope by which they will hang themselves. The only question that remains is will the Palestinians believe that Hamas hanged itself, or will they think that it's the Jews fault. I choose to think that perhaps they might see the light, while knowing that they probably won't.
Posted by: Kathy at January 26, 2006 11:58 PM (JeBdM)
4
I call him Abu Mazen because that it is his terrorist name, given to him by his people. You see, I have never forgotten for a moment that Abu Mazen is a terrorist.
I understand why you stand by your comments from last year, you genuinely believed that it might be different, and you had hope. That does not make you a bad person. But you were wrong.
I stand by my comments last year, and although I wish it were different, the past year has proven me to be right. Abu Mazen accomplished nothing last year, except that he helped his people kill more Jews.
Just this year alone:
Jan 2, 2005 - Nissim Arbiv, 25, of Nissanit in the Gaza Strip was mortally wounded in a mortar shell attack while working in the Erez Industrial Zone. He died of his wounds on January 11. Two others were wounded in the attack, for which Hamas claimed responsibility.
Jan 7, 2005 - St.-Sgt. Yosef (Yossi) Atia, 21, of Petah Tikva, was killed and three fellow off-duty soldiers were wounded when Palestinian gunmen opened fire on their car on the Trans-Samaria Highway. The Fatah al-Aksa Martyrs Brigades claimed responsibility for the attack.
Jan 9, 2005 - An Israeli officer is killed, and three others injured, in a Hezbollah rocket attack along the Lebanese border (Shebba Farms).
Jan 12, 2005 - Gideon Rivlin, 50, of Ganei Tal was killed and three IDF soldiers were wounded when a bomb was detonated as a military vehicle patroled the route near Morag in the southern Gaza Strip. Two terrorists were killed by IDF forces. The area was booby-trapped with explosive devices, in addition to the bomb that exploded. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack.
Jan 13, 2005 - On Thursday night, shortly before the closing of the Karni Crossing, terrorists activated an explosive device on the Palestinian side, blowing a hole in the door through which Palestinian terrorists infiltrated the Israeli side of the crossing and opened fire at Israeli civilians. As a result of the explosion and exchanges of fire, six Israeli civilians and three Palestinian terrorists were killed, and five Israeli civilians were wounded. Hamas and the Fatah al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed joint responsiblity for the attack. The victims: Dror Gizri, 30, of Sderot; Ibrahim Kahili, 46, of Umm al-Ghanem; Munam Abu Sabia, 33, of Daburiyeh; Ivan Shmilov, 53, of Sderot; Herzl Shlomo, 51, of Sderot; and Ofer Tiri, 23, of Ashkelon.
Jan 15, 2005 - Ayala-Haya (Ella) Abukasis, 17, of Sderot was mortally wounded when a Qassam rocket landed near her and shrapnel penetrated her cerebellum, leaving her brain dead. She was struck while protecting her younger brother, who was lightly wounded. Kept on life support throughout the week, her parents agreed to stop treatment when doctors told them there was no chance of recovery. She died on January 21.
Jan 18, 2005 - Oded Sharon, 36, from Gan Yavne, an ISA officer, was killed, an IDF officer seriously wounded, and four IDF soldiers and three members of the ISA were lightly wounded in a suicide bombing attack at the Gush Katif junction in the central Gaza Strip. While search procedures were being implemented at a post at the junction, the suicide bomber with explosives strapped to his body detonated himself. Hamas claimed responsibility for the attack.
Jan 18, 2005 - 17-year-old Israeli girl dies trying to protect her 10-year-old brother from a Hamas rocket attack (on 1-15 in Sderot).
The "Truce" or "Hudna" or whatever you want to call it agreed to by Sharon and Abu Mazen began February 8, 2005. The following attacks occured during the so called Truce:
Feb 25, 2005 - Five people were killed and 50 wounded Friday night, when a suicide bomber blew himself up outside the Stage club on the Tel Aviv promenade at around 11:20 P.M., on the corner of Herbert Samuel and Yonah Hanavi streets. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack.
The victims: Yitzhak Buzaglo, 40, of Mishmar Hayarden; Aryeh Nagar, 37, of Kfar Sava; Yael Orbach, 28, of Rehovot; Ronen Reuvenov, 30, of Tel Aviv. Odelia Hubara, 26, of Jerusalem, died of her wounds on February 28.
May 2, 2005 - St.-Sgt. Dan Talasnikov, 21, of Nir Galim was killed and another soldier lightly wounded in an exchange of fire during an operation to arrest wanted terrorists from the Islamic Jihad in the village of Saida, north of Tulkarem. One of the terrorists, responsible for the February 25 suicide bombing in Tel Aviv, was killed. The second terrorist was apprehended.
Mar 7, 2005 - Two Israelis are wounded by a Palestinian sniper in Hebron.
Jun 7, 2005 - Three workers were killed and five wounded when a Qassam rocket hit a packing shed in Ganei Tal, in the Gaza Strip, penetrating the building's roof and exploding indoors. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack.
Jun 19, 2005 - IDF NCO Sgt.-Maj. Avi Karouchi, 25, of Beersheba was killed and two soldiers were wounded in a coordinated Palestinian attack in which RPG missiles and gunfire were fired at an IDF engineering force conducting construction work on the Philadelphi route along the Israeli-Egyptian border. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack.
Jun 20, 2005 - Yevgeny Reider, 28 of Hermesh was killed and a 16-year old teenager was wounded in a terrorist shooting attack in the village of Baka A-Sharkiya in the northern West Bank. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack.
Jun 24, 2005 - Avihai Levy, 17, of Beit Hagai was killed in a drive-by terrorist shooting at a hitchhiking stop about 200 meters from the entrance to Beit Hagai, south of Hebron. Aviad Mansour, 16, of Otniel, fatally wounded in the attack, died on June 26. Three others were wounded. The Islamic Jihad and Fatah al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed responsibility for the attack.
Jun 29, 2005 - Hezbollah attacks an Israeli position at Mt. Dov from across the Lebanese border, killing one and injuring three.
Jul 12, 2005 - Rachel Ben Abu, 16, of Tel Aviv; Nofar Horowitz, 16, of Tel Aviv; and Julia Voloshin, 31, of Netanya were killed and about 90 people were wounded when a suicide bomber detonated himself outside Hasharon Mall in Netanya. Anya Lifshitz, 50, of Netanya, who was mortally wounded, succumbed to her wounds on July 13. Cpl. Moshe Maor Jan, 21, of Netanya died of his wounds on July 14. The bomber was identified as Ahmed Abu Khalil, 18, from the West Bank village of Atil. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack.
Jul 14, 2005 - Dana Gelkovitch, 22, of Kibbutz Bror Hayil, was killed by a Qassam rocket fired at Netiv Ha'asara in the northern Gaza Strip. Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Fatah all claimed responsibility for the attack.
Israel gave up Gaza for peace. And how did Israel's partners in peace respond? There are the terrorist attacks after the expulsion and, of course, still during the Truce:
Jul 23, 2005 - Dov, 58, and Rachel Kol, 53, of Jerusalem were killed shortly after midnight on Saturday night near the Kissufim crossing in the southern Gaza Strip while returning home from visiting family in Gush Katif. Three others were wounded. The Islamic Jihad and Fatah al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed responsibility for the attack.
Aug 3, 2005 - Palestinian terrorists fire a rocket at a group of Israeli demonstrators in Sderot. The missile hits their own group instead, killing a 3-year-old boy and injuring nine others, including five children.
Aug 24, 2005 - Shmuel Mett, 21, of Britain, a Mir Yeshiva student, was returning from the Western Wall to the yeshiva in JerusalemÂ’s Beit Yisrael neighborhood when he was fatally stabbed near Jaffa Gate in the Old City. Two other students were wounded.
Aug 28, 2005 - A Fatah terrorist detonated a suicide bomb in Beersheba, eight Israelis are hospitalized, including two guards that were seriously wounded.
Sept 21, 2005 - Sasson Nuriel, 55, of Jerusalem was kidnapped and slain by Palestinian terrorists. His body was found on Sept 26 in a garbage dump in the industrial zone of Bitunya, west of Ramallah. Hamas claimed responsibility for the attack.
Oct 16, 2005 - Matat (Rosenfeld) Adler, 21, and her cousin, Kineret Mandel, 23, both of Carmel, and Oz Ben-Meir, 15, of Maon were killed and three were wounded when Palestinians opened fire at the Gush Etzion junction south of Jerusalem. Another teenager was shot and seriously wounded near Eli, in Samaria. The Fatah Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed responsibility for both attacks.
Oct 26, 2005 - Six people were killed and 55 wounded, six seriously, in a suicide bombing at the Hadera open-air market. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack. The victims: Michael Kaufman, 68, of Hadera; Pirhiya Machlouf, 53, of Hadera; Sabiha Nissim, 66, of Moshav Ahituv; Jamil Qa'adan, 48, of Baka al-Gharbiya; and Ya'acov Rahmani, 68, of Hadera. A sixth victim, Genia Poleis, 66, of Hadera, died of her wounds 11 days later, on November 5.
Nov 2, 2005 - St.-Sgt. Yonatan Evron, 20, of Rishon Lezion, was mortally wounded in a gun battle with terrorists near Jenin. He died en route to hospital.
Nov 21, 2005 - Eleven Israeli soldiers and one civilian are injured by a Hezbollah attack in Metulla, Northern Israel..
Dec 5, 2005 - Five people were killed and over 50 wounded in a suicide bombing at the entrance to the Sharon shopping mall in Netanya. The terrorist detonated the bomb when he was stopped by security guards, one of whom was killed. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack. The victims: Haim Amram, 26, of Netanya, a security guard at the mall; Alexandra Garmitzky, 65, of Netanya; Daniel Golani, 45, of Nahariya; Elia Rosen, 38, of Bat Hefer; and Keinan Tsuami, 20, of Petah Tikva.
Dec 8, 2005 - Sgt. Nir Kahane, 20, of Kiryat Tivon, was stabbed to death at the Kalandiya checkpoint, south of Ramallah. The assailant was apprehended. The Fatah al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed responsibility for the attack.
Dec 16, 2005 - Yosef (Yossi) Shok, 35, of Beit Hagai was killed in a shooting attack while driving home in the southern Hebron hills. Two passengers were wounded. The Islamic Jihad and Fatah Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed joint responsibility for the attack.
Dec 29, 2005 - Lt. Ori Binamo, 21, of Nesher was killed when a terrorist en route to carry out an attack in Israel detonated himself at roadblock set up near Tulkarm following an intelligence tip. Two Palestinians were also killed, one the taxi driver who was carrying the bomber. Three soldiers and seven Palestinians were wounded.
The number of rockets and mortar shells on Israeli targets has sharply increased since the expulsion, with 130 attacks from January through July, the eve of the expulsion, and 179 since then. Most of them fell during the Truce. And many of them came from Gaza. Hamas fires rockets into Israel pretty much every day.
Arab mother Um Nidal, is also known as Mariam Farahat, and she became famous when she was filmed bidding her 17-year-old son Mohammed farewell to die through a terrorist attack. She ordered him "not to return except as a shahid [martyr for Allah]." Ordering one son to die was not enough, Um sent three of her sons to die and murder others in the process.
When a mother orders three of her children to kill themselves and to kill innocent civilians with them, what better candidate could you have to help run the new Palestinian government?
Last week Mariam Farahat was a star in the Arab world, because her son murdered 5 high school students.
Yesterday, Mariam Farahat, was elected to the Palestinian parliament.
This is what the Palestinian people stand for, this is what they want, and this is who they vote for.
I could post link after link to poll after poll where Palestinians claim in overwhelming numbers that they back suicide bombers and killing of Jews and the destruction of Israel. But we have all seen those polls and I think I've said enough here for now.
Again, I pray you are right, but I fear you are wrong.
Posted by: LindaSoG at January 27, 2006 06:20 AM (IgAoC)
5
"Abu" denotes familial relation. Calling him Abu Mazen is literally calling him "Father of Mazen". It's not a terrorist name, it's a term of endearment that insiders/friends use to show respect for the fact that the man has fathered a male heir. If I'm not mistaken, they always and only use the first-born son when conferring this label on a man.
Posted by: MRN aka "The Husband" at January 27, 2006 07:31 AM (JeBdM)
6
Sorry but Abu Mazen is the name Abbas used as a PLO terrorist.
Posted by: LindaSoG at January 29, 2006 07:13 PM (fdJmC)
7
Linda,
Sure, that might be the name he used when he was in the PLO, but it's also an Arab term of endearment. By calling him that you are drawing attention to the fact he has a male heir, and in the process you're honoring him.
The husband has worked in the Middle East, Kuwait specifically, and he addresses his Kuwaiti partner and friend,"Abu Salman" which means, "father of Salman," instead of by his given name of Ahmed. Abu Salman is a term of endearment. It is also a title that requires the speaker to be on friendly terms with the holder. People in the PLO undoubtedly called him that, but that name didn't have anything to do with his terrorist status. It did, however, have everything to do with his status in the Arab world as a man who has a male heir, which as we all know is something Arabs and Muslims choose to celebrate.
You might think you're drawing attention to the fact Abbas was in the PLO by using this name, but that's not the case at all. I'm sorry to tell you this, but you're making a rather large cultural faux pas that draws attention away from the very relevant arguments you make regarding the future of the Israeli people and the fact that Abbas is no one to honor when you instead do the exact opposite and honor him, and the fact he's fathered more Palenstinians who undoubtedly hate Jews. It's jarring and it takes away from your point rather than adding to it.
Posted by: Kathy at January 29, 2006 09:25 PM (JeBdM)
8
You are making an issue out of my use of the name Abu Mazen to avoid the other issues raised in my comments.
Its okay, I understand the tactic, although I don't use it myself.
Posted by: LindaSoG at January 30, 2006 06:55 AM (1h02T)
9
No, Linda. I didn't refute the rest of your argument because I don't really disagree with you, I'm just coming at it from a different viewpoint. There's nothing to argue out.
I am making an issue out of your using the name Abu Mazen because I think it takes away from your commentary, rather than adding to it. There's no other reason than that. It means "Father of Mazen." If you would like to honor Abbas, go right ahead. You should know, however, that you look foolish when you do, and I thought you'd perhaps want to know. I'll spare myself the trouble in the future.
Posted by: Kathy at January 30, 2006 08:00 AM (JeBdM)
10
Calling Abbas by his terrorist name is not an honor, perhaps if you had a better understanding of who he is and where the name originated, you would see things in a different way.
Kinda like accepting a Hamas government as an experiment, without taking into consideration how many Jewish lives will be sacrified to your experiment.
I have friends and family in Israel. Its less of an experiment and more of a personal thing for me. Perhaps if it were your family and friends at risk, you would be less welcoming of such experiments.
Posted by: LindaSoG at January 30, 2006 09:37 AM (j8/91)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 25, 2006
No Money For The Wicked
The husband, God Bless him, has many problems with the Kelo decision, one of which is that he believes there won't be much of a market for home mortgages if governments can just up and give your property to someone who will pay more taxes. Free market logic follows that while lenders will be leery of lending to individuals in a post-Kelo world, they'll still lend money to developers.
But perhaps we shouldn't be so quick to condemn the bankers...
CHARLOTTE — Regional bank BB&T will make no loans to developers who plan to build commercial projects on land taken from private citizens by the government through the power of eminent domain.
"The idea that a citizen's property can be taken by the government solely for private use is extremely misguided; in fact it's just plain wrong," John Allison, chairman and chief executive of the Winston-Salem-based bank, said Wednesday.
No other large U.S. bank has a similar policy, according to BB&T spokesman. The bank declined to estimate how much business they expect to lose as a result of the new policy. {...}
The ninth largest bank in the United States of America just said that their non-commercial customers were more important than property developers. That's customer service.
If I lived in that neck of the woods, you could be damned sure that I'd switch my accounts to BB&T.
{Via Martini Boy and Below the Beltway}
Posted by: Kathy at
11:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 245 words, total size 2 kb.
Your Question (s) of the Day
Can someone please tell me why I should take all of these "Europe will go to hell in a handbasket in fifteen years because they're not reproducing at a rate that will support their welfare governments, etc." demographic projections seriously?
Perhaps I should rephrase that. I know why I should take it seriously. I don't need a lecture about battling Islamofascism in the Netherlands and the death of Theo Van Gogh and how his murderer was actually a Dutch-born muslim, and that's the best example we've got of Europe's problem, etc., thank you ever so much. I don't need that explained.
Here's what I would like explained: After a lifetime of having to listen to how we human beings were going to overpopulate the planet, using up all the natural resources, and pretty much leaving the Earth as one big cesspool of toxic slime because we couldn't stop ourselves from making babies, I now have to listen to the absolute reverse. Why on Earth am I supposed to believe these new population numbers that foretell the doom of a white, Christian Europe, when the worldwide overpopulation that was widely predicted and hyped to be our doom never happened?
You can understand why I'm skeptical, right? Who am I supposed to believe?
Posted by: Kathy at
11:16 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 1 kb.
1
One good reason is that a society failing to reproduce itself above its current population level has never happened before in the history of the modern welfare state. And the basic math suggests the two - welfare state and shrinking population - can't coexist for long.
Another is that the "overpopulation" stuff has been proved wrong repeatedly because human capacity for overcoming shortages via innovation has exceeded the expecations of those who assumed the opposite. But this time we're talking about reducing the number of humans - ergo, reduced human capacity to figure stuff out.
As for whom your supposed to believe, I'm truly unfamilar with anyone who denies the above. All I see are people quibbling about the actual date it all falls apart unless some hypothetical change occurs.
Posted by: Doug at January 25, 2006 11:58 PM (7P5xE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 24, 2006
Bleh
Blogging will be light to non-existent until further notice as I have, ONCE AGAIN, gotten sick.
I can't even come up with a witty throwaway line for this space. I've struggled and struggled and can't string two thoughts together in a coherent fashion, so I'm going to go and shower (because I feel bleechy) and then I'm going to retire to the sofa where I will either read or watch something crappy on tee vee. I might even nap a bit. And while I'm lying on the sofa, my bones flabby with illness, I'll---undoubtedly---think up a witty line for this spot, and when I do...
...well, if I were you, I wouldn't have high hopes for it to make it to this page.
Posted by: Kathy at
10:05 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yikes, honey, feel better soon.
I'm in a funk and you're sick, the world will certainly go to hell now.
; )
Posted by: Chrissy at January 24, 2006 01:27 PM (DTrX+)
2
Get well quick – the blogging world needs your wit! It makes my coffee go down smooth every morning - Ah, gees that may be the Baileys Irish Cream. No matter, get well soon…
Posted by: Edd at January 25, 2006 10:41 AM (aaXuU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 23, 2006
Printed Without Permission
Because I can't quite help myself.
Posted by: Kathy at
10:12 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My daughter bought a T-shirt that said, "RUN KATIE RUN". I did not object.
Posted by: alexandra at January 23, 2006 07:03 PM (y6n8O)
2
I noted with considerable glee, that short statured, shark teethed Tom, in War of the Worlds, was getting a bit of a bum on him. Hard to miss really, considering shark teeth was in virtually every scene of the absurd movie.
It was quite a mish-mash, the movie: Spielberg's dazzling flashing adolescent lights, special effects, bezerk, ridiculous action and Tom's teeth and bum, and a thin story you could spit through. Tim Robbin's contribution, courtesy of Madman Spielberg, was wonderfully silly.
'Course, "they" would say I'm jealous 'a Tom. ;-)
Rob :-)
Posted by: Robert_R (summerman) at January 24, 2006 12:57 AM (NWI5F)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2006
Coincidences
On this day twenty-five years ago, after four hundred and fourty-four days of captivity, the U.S. embassy employees who had been taken hostage by Iranian students who had stormed the embassy were released.
Today, Iran started moving its assets out of European banks to shield them from possible UN sanctions for ignoring the world's will about their nuclear ambitions.
Did I mention that one of the main demands of the Iranian hostage takers in 1979 was the release of Iran's assets held in the U.S., which had been frozen when the Shah was deposed?
{Insert Twilight Zone Theme Music Here}
Posted by: Kathy at
02:18 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
Spew Alert!
Just clicked over to see what
the boys were up to and blew a mouthful of Sprite all over my screen when I saw the new banner they've put up.
JESUS CHRIST ON A PIECE OF TOAST!
The boys' obsession with this Melissa WhateverTheHellHerNameIs has gotten way out of control. She's WAY out of your league, boysl. WAY out of your league. Lest we forget their origins:
Didn't happen with Kelly LeBrock. Ain't. Gonna. Happen. With. Melissa. Give up the ghost already.
Posted by: Kathy at
01:49 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh, sure, Madam "Would You Like Me To Lizzie Your Bennet, Mr. Firth?"
Posted by: Robert the Llama Butcher at January 20, 2006 03:34 PM (piZDb)
2
You have a point, but do you see Mr. Firth up there in the banner?
I don't think so. I, unlike you two, at least have a handle on my obsession.
Ahem.
Or so I tell myself.
Posted by: Kathy at January 20, 2006 10:39 PM (JeBdM)
3
Awesome! Totally awesome!
Posted by: Sadie at January 21, 2006 01:41 AM (xV63t)
Posted by: Bill from INDC at January 21, 2006 11:36 PM (hDDCf)
5
I don't know if I can do
that....how about Jesus Christ on an English Muffin?
Posted by: Steve the LLamabutcher at January 23, 2006 11:32 AM (c5Jw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
81kb generated in CPU 0.0308, elapsed 0.1091 seconds.
62 queries taking 0.0921 seconds, 212 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.