January 13, 2006
I've Never Been To Jersey
And there's no wistfulness attached to that statement, but I've always thought the place must be pretty kitschy, given that it's home to Tony Soprano,
Kevin Smith, Alfred Einstein and, last but not least,
Fausta.
Turns out I was right:
TRENTON, N.J. - With curious officeworkers gawking and strip-bar standards playing in the background, several hundred people joined a handful of exotic dancers in front of the Statehouse on Thursday to rally against New Jersey's new indoor smoking ban.
About 20 of the women — who, to the disappointment of some in the crowd, didn't reveal anything more risque than their midriffs — said the ban will result in lost clients and lost money.
"It's going to murder our business," said Dominique Hernandez, 24, who dances at a lounge in Florence. "A lot of people want to get off of work, have a drink and a smoke and watch some pretty girls. There's nothing wrong with that."
Apparently not, judging by the looks Hernandez — in tight jeans and a revealing black T-shirt — received from onlookers.
"I'm just passing by on the way to the office," was the refrain from many men, and some women, in the crowd.
But many said they came to protest the smoking ban, saying it was a violation of their rights.
"I've been a smoker since I was 13 and it's really against our rights," said Allan Brophy, 24, of Union. "Pretty soon they're going to be outlawing it in our houses."
Brophy did admit that word of strippers at the rally had "piqued my interest."{...}
Strippers, who are being hit in the G-string by yet another smoking ban, are out there, fighting for their fiscal survival. God love 'em.
Posted by: Kathy at
10:34 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 296 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You should really visit Jersey. It's quite sophisticated, as well as kitschy.
I covered this same story in my weblog:
www.HarleysCars.com
My permanent home is in Woodstock, NY, but I spend my work week in Jersey. Asians flock to Jersey City, which has a huge population of Filipinos, Vietnamese and Indians. Jersey actually has the cultural and racial diversity that the snobs in Manhattan only talk about. And you can actually get some space for your money, instead of living in a closet in the city.
And the Jersey shore is spectacular, so long as you side step the condoms and syringes.
Posted by: Shouting Thomas at January 14, 2006 08:26 AM (JSK8V)
2
New Jersey is a shithole. And I swear the entire state is rotting. Nothing else can explain the persistent odor that you smell as soon as you cross the border.
Unfortuanately I have to fly out there for business fairly often. I dread every trip.
I wait for the day when Jersey falls into the ocean. I doubt anyone will care...or even notice.
Posted by: Kevin at January 15, 2006 10:53 PM (Nmxi6)
3
NJ is lovely. I've lived in several other states and overseas and decided to make NJ my home.
And I'm greatly honored to be in the company of Kevin Smith and former Princeton inhabitant Albert Einstein. Thanks!
Posted by: Fausta at January 16, 2006 02:09 PM (liKgd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 12, 2006
"The White House Cookbook: Coffee, Tea, Beverages, Part One
Ok, so moving along from doughy stuff, I should probably make you aware this is the section where you'll find recipes---ahem---to MAKE YOUR OWN BOOZE.
Perhaps not in this installment, but maybe in the next.
Take the jump anyway so you don't feel like a schmuck when you come back for the next few. Besides, there's some early 20th Century medical benefits to drinking buttermilk listed that might interest some of you.
more...
Posted by: Kathy at
11:06 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1735 words, total size 10 kb.
1
People who put milk in their tea are therefore drinking boots and shoes in mild disguise.
Thank you.
P.S. I Wonder if you shouldn't re-iterate the source of these gems, lest some new readers think you've gone completely off your nut.
Posted by: MRN aka "The Husband" at January 13, 2006 08:13 AM (JeBdM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 11, 2006
News Flash!
Oprah's codependent.
NEW YORK - Oprah Winfrey broke her silence about James Frey's disputed memoir of addiction, "A Million Little Pieces," dismissing allegations of falsehoods as "much ado about nothing" and urging readers who have been inspired by the book to "Keep holding on."
"What is relevant is that he was a drug addict ... and stepped out of that history to be the man he is today and to take that message to save other people and allow them to save themselves," Winfrey said Wednesday night in a surprise phone call to CNN's Larry King, who was interviewing Frey on his live television program.{...}
If Random House is offering people their money back, well, that just means like the Paris incident last summer, Oprah's once again having a momentary delusion of grandeur. And just like last summer, it's all about the delusion of what she thinks is happening in her world, while the rest of us see something entirely different.
Posted by: Kathy at
10:09 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The message doesn't have to be technically correct for it to be "true" in a more spiritual sense, you see. What you shallow people would see as a "lie" merely reveals a "deeper truth" to us, the enlightened.
So what we're looking at here is that old whore of 19th-century "higher criticism" with a brand new Hollywood boob job.
Posted by: Bob at January 12, 2006 11:27 AM (yMzz+)
2
Weird synchronicity:
I first heard about this book two days ago. A friend mentioned specifically the part about the guy going through intense dentistry without benefit of painkillers because he was in recovery. As a 17+ year veteran of recovery myself, my immediate reaction to that was that the guy was taking some artistic license, as nothing about any twelve-step program pravents the use of necessary anesthesia or painkillers as long as they are taken as prescribed and under a doc's supervision. Lo and behold, the article specifically mentions that as part of the subject mtter that has been called into question.
Posted by: Mark at January 12, 2006 01:30 PM (2HG82)
3
I've always found it curious that Oprah not only names her magazine after herself but puts herself on each and every cover.
Posted by: Fausta at January 13, 2006 10:20 AM (CyN8O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
National Delurking Week
Ok, since everyone else is doing it and I'm a sucker that way with the peer pressure, those of you who stop by on a regular basis but who don't comment and leave me wondering about who the hell you are when I troll through the referral logs, here's your golden opportunity to, for once, put me out of my misery.
It's time to delurk, my devoted Cake Eater readers.
Just click on the comments button below and say 'hi'. You don't have to leave an email address or a web address. Just a name. It can be a fake name, too, but I'll be happy so long as you leave that much.
And if you're one of my regular readers from Iceland (I was checking the super duper server stats today and there were a BOATLOAD of hits from Iceland!) say "hi" and tell me why you are here. Is it that boring there in the winter that you have to surf blogs to keep from going nuts? Do tell.
Posted by: Kathy at
09:33 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.
1
First. Woo.
Hello from the Right Side of the Mountain. The Yaks (Random Yak and Random Maniyak) wander over this way with some frequency. But we didn't start from Iceland. Parts of the U.S.A. are cold at this time of year though - does that count?
Posted by: The Random Yak at January 11, 2006 10:03 PM (p0W/4)
Posted by: sadie at January 11, 2006 10:04 PM (xV63t)
3
You rang?
Oops, I thought you said it was de-Lurching week. I'll go back to my post by the foyer now.
(heavy, disgusted sigh, shaking head)
Posted by: Ted C. at January 11, 2006 11:00 PM (AkbjX)
4
"Lurking device deactivated, Kep-ten!"
Kathy, thanks for the kind words.
Posted by: Pious Agnostic at January 12, 2006 06:20 AM (7dkzi)
5
um, *toes the ground*, hi!
Posted by: Jeff at January 12, 2006 07:10 AM (tGj3Z)
6
How do you do, Ms. Kathy!
De-lurkifying is kinda painful. I hope it doesn't leave a mark . . .
Posted by: Dave at January 12, 2006 07:11 AM (6GFTi)
7
Just stumbled in and can't find my way out.
Like your style.
Posted by: joe at January 12, 2006 09:51 AM (ThFVd)
8
I keep falling back in here every 2nd or 3rd time I visit the Llamas...
Posted by: Rex Ferric at January 12, 2006 10:22 AM (bqPDz)
9
*rings the bell* your pizza's here.
Posted by: amelie at January 12, 2006 11:28 AM (og1il)
10
Sorry to be late to de-lurk, I was adding water to acid.
Posted by: John at January 12, 2006 12:05 PM (870vv)
11
No. I won't succocmb to the pressure. You can't make me. Just so we're clear, this is not a comment. Its a drill. Its only a drill. IF this were a real comment, I'd say something. Anything. Just not this.
Posted by: RP at January 12, 2006 01:45 PM (LlPKh)
12
I know someone who has been to Iceland. Maybe they hit your site while they were there...
Posted by: matt at January 12, 2006 04:19 PM (DZI+P)
13
de-lurking as requested. keep up the good work.
Posted by: erika at January 12, 2006 05:42 PM (kRsLl)
14
Okay, I said "hi" - can I go back to lurking now?
Posted by: wendy at January 13, 2006 06:14 AM (dWM6F)
15
Hi. And it is always a pleasure to drop in.
Posted by: Bill at January 14, 2006 09:36 PM (REE1t)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Put This One in the "Payback's a Bitch" Folder
Well, it looks like Pat Robertson's really done it this time:
JERUSALEM -Israel will not do business with Pat Robertson after the evangelical leader suggested Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's massive stroke was divine punishment for the Gaza withdrawal, a tourism official said Wednesday.
Robertson is leading a group of evangelicals who have pledged to raise $50 million to build a large Christian tourism center in Israel's northern Galilee region, where tradition says Jesus lived and taught.
But Avi Hartuv, a spokesman for Tourism Minister Avraham Hirschson, said Israeli officials were furious with Robertson, a Christian broadcaster. A day after Sharon's Jan. 4 stroke, Robertson said the prime minister was being punished for "dividing God's land," — a reference to last summer's pullout from the Gaza Strip and four West Bank settlements.
"We can't accept this kind of statement," Hartuv said.
He said the Christian Heritage Center project was now in question, though he left the door open to develop it with others.
"We will not do business with him, only with other evangelicals who don't back these comments," Hartuv said. "We will do business with other evangelical leaders, friends of Israel, but not with him."{...}
Pat Robertson: his big, fat mouth delayed the Second Coming of Christ.
You think the Evangelicals who watch the 700 Club will be happy about this development? I think a hooker has a better chance of being caught up by the Rapture than Robertson has of getting out of this with his skin intact.
Posted by: Kathy at
09:52 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 267 words, total size 2 kb.
1
No, a hooker has a better chance of getting out of this than Robertson has of being caught up by the Rapture.
Posted by: Bob at January 11, 2006 10:31 AM (yMzz+)
2
"Pat Robertson: his big, fat mouth delayed the Second Coming of Christ."
Heh.
Posted by: Doug at January 11, 2006 11:16 AM (oiTVK)
3
In the minds of people who live in the real world, Pat has lost it. Not surprisingly however, his fans think he's courageous:
http://www.jnewswire.com/library/article.php?articleid=942
Beam me up.
Posted by: EveningStar at January 11, 2006 05:02 PM (xr/uv)
4
Say, do you think that Pat Robertson believes in Karma after this?
Posted by: Pious Agnostic at January 11, 2006 06:07 PM (A9wtV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 10, 2006
The Cake Eater New Year's Mantra
Muscle weighs more than fat.
Say it with me. Muscle weighs more than fat.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
And if you say it enough times, it might actually turn out to be true.
Posted by: Kathy at
02:01 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'll throw in an "AMEN" for good measure.
That mantra is already my own.
; )
Posted by: Chrissy at January 10, 2006 05:22 PM (zJsUT)
2
Not only is that true, but muscle mass burns more calories
EVEN WHILE AT REST than blubber.
Really.
I don't know about that "Diet Coke cancelling out excess calories" thing, though. Aheh.
Posted by: Margi at January 11, 2006 02:25 PM (nwEQH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Unusual Presents
So...I can't keep a lid on this one any longer.
I was hoping the urge to discuss it would pass me by, but it hasn't. Hence I'm going to submit to it and let the cards fall where they may.
This person I know---who shall remain anonymous---is receiving an unusual present for Christmas. I say "receiving" because they haven't actually gotten their present yet, but will be sometime in the near future.
You, my devoted Cake Eater readers, are undoubtedly wondering what this "unusual" Christmas present is.
Well, it's a boob job.
It's something that she wants, and her husband is quite happy with her the way she is, but has told her if this is what she really wants, she should go ahead with it and this will be her Christmas present.
What say you, my devoted Cake Eater readers? Would you be happy with a boob job for a Christmas present? Would you be happy, if you're one of my male Cake Eater readers, giving your wife this present, instead of, say, a nice piece of jewelry? Or is this just like giving money to your spouse to buy that bass fishing boat they've always wanted.
Discuss.
Posted by: Kathy at
09:57 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.
1
q. 1
Would you be happy with a boob job for a Christmas present?
No.
q. 2 Can't speak for male readers, or for other female readers, only for myself. I'd much rather get a nice piece of jewelry, preferrably from Tiffany's -- Elsa Peretti stuff, for instance, especially if measured in carats.
Posted by: Fausta at January 10, 2006 10:16 AM (CyN8O)
2
Would you be happy with a boob job for a Christmas present?
Not really as I don't think very many people find men with boobs attractive. Although I could stay home and entertain myself for hours.
Would you be happy...
If she's happy with the idea, and doing it for do make herself happy, then more power to her. If she's getting chesticle work to fulfill her husband's fascination with bouncies or to compete with the girl next doorÂ’s girls, well that's when I would object.
Posted by: phin at January 10, 2006 11:05 AM (Xvpen)
3
Say what???????
And Phin really
does< need a boob job...
Posted by: agent bedhead at January 10, 2006 11:29 AM (cP0Aq)
Posted by: Robert the Llama Butcher at January 10, 2006 12:22 PM (IkTb7)
5
Well, I guess you've finally answered the question "What do you give the woman who has everything...in relatively small amounts."
I'm not into boob jobs - for many reasons, starting with the fact that yaks look silly with implants.
I'm not into giving boob jobs - I think I'd be more inclined to try and give the woman in question a boost to her self-image. Wait - I guess, in her case, that means a boob job. If it's what she really wanted, I suppose the answer is "let them have boobs."
Posted by: The Random Yak at January 10, 2006 12:26 PM (dsGTv)
6
I'm vote "FOR" Phin's cosmetic surgery (I'm odd that way), but I do think a boob job as a "gift" is odder yet. It's not anything like your example of a bass boat. (Though come to think of it, it
is a bit like a life-preserver.)
Posted by: Bob at January 10, 2006 12:32 PM (yMzz+)
7
Depending on the situation it sounds like a great stocking stuffer. Question: can you return them if they're the wrong size or color?
Posted by: Night Writer at January 10, 2006 12:38 PM (Qp4wA)
8
Books. Give me books. Or a bookstore. Magazines, paperdolls, an mp3 player, nix on the jewelry or boob jobs...and I suppose it would be for Chanukah or my birthday...
Posted by: Rachel Ann at January 10, 2006 01:08 PM (fIRjZ)
9
Stick to jewelry. I got over big boobs in law school when I saw a set with stretch marks.
Posted by: LMC at January 10, 2006 05:31 PM (61/Yb)
10
No. Unless it was a
reduction... Really - and I'd be more than pleased to DONATE!
-- R'cat
CatHouse Chat
Posted by: Romeocat at January 10, 2006 07:15 PM (31z6c)
11
Think ahead...that's my motto.
Trust me. Implants on a 70 year old woman look "udderly" ridiculous.
Posted by: Pammy at January 10, 2006 07:31 PM (P1maP)
12
Those who have the smaller set, want bigger ones; and those who have bigger set, want smaller ones.
That is one guy's observation...
Posted by: KMR at January 10, 2006 07:35 PM (HLXIT)
13
Would I like a boob job for Christmas?
Hmm. At one time, the answer would have been an emphatic yes. My mom's friend for many years took out a "Home Improvement Loan." (I always thought that was VERY DAMNED CLEVER of her.) My neighbor on the AF base in Oklahoma got one. Nicest set of titties I ever did see. (And yes, I not only got to see them but I got to feel 'em too.) And before anyone thinks I'm kinky to the extreme, she had done her research and the implants were placed under her musculature instead of just under the skin and they looked DAMNED FINE.
Watching her have to go through the pain of massaging those bad boys every night so they wouldn't harden up, though, was one deal-breaker for this chick. I have a high tolerance for pain but that was REEEE-DICULOUS. I also was told by several plastic surgeons that I could not be guaranteed NO LOSS OF SENSATION. (I have pretty sensitive nipples and. . .well, lets just say that's not altogether a bad thing.)
And then I hit 40. And you know, God gave me this little titties. And they've been pretty good to me -- they're even getting ready to use 'em to nourish the Wee Bairn, so I know they work. . .
So, no. I'd rather have a new car.
But I can certainly understand why someone ELSE would enjoy that Christmas present -- and if that's what their hearts' desire, then I say: GO FOR IT.
Posted by: Margi at January 10, 2006 11:33 PM (nwEQH)
14
"Would you be happy with a boob job for a Christmas present?"
It depends on who is attached to the boobs in question. ;o)>
Posted by: Mark at January 11, 2006 11:40 PM (2HG82)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"The White House Cookbook": Breads, Part Two
More doughy stuff after the jump, including the Boston Brown Bread recipe from the Palmer House in Chicago, and the Corn Bread recipe from the St. Charles Hotel in New Orleans.
You can find part one here.
more...
Posted by: Kathy at
12:26 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 2227 words, total size 13 kb.
January 09, 2006
Ahem
BUSTED!
Look for Oprah to rid herself of her book club---again---in the very near future.
Then look for an episode where she talks about how betrayed she feels about all of this and how the emotional upheaval caused her to eat five fried chickens and some plain white toast.
{Hat tip: Miss Margi}
Posted by: Kathy at
02:01 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: phin at January 09, 2006 02:44 PM (Xvpen)
2
Damn. Phin beat me to it.
Posted by: RP at January 09, 2006 04:15 PM (LlPKh)
3
Now, there you guys go again...confusing Jake and Elwood's diets.
"...Shit. They still owe you money, fool."
Posted by: MRN aka "The Husband" at January 09, 2006 11:28 PM (hbcMs)
4
....unless she was implying that Oprah is the gastronomical equivalent of BOTH Jake & Elwood Blues.
Posted by: Russ from Winterset at January 10, 2006 11:34 AM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Kathy at January 10, 2006 12:17 PM (hbcMs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 08, 2006
Firsts and Lasts And All Manner of Nuttiness In Between
Quality filler swiped from
Sheila...read on after the jump if you're interested.
more...
Posted by: Kathy at
11:01 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1298 words, total size 8 kb.
1
"....I'd kill a cow for him."
We'll be butchering a couple of feeder calves in early August. Shall I pencil you in?
Very informative, Kathy. Excellent choice in "favorite song". I saw them live at Carver Hawkeye in Iowa City in October 1987 (with the BoDeans opening), and they opened with that song. Absolutely, hands down, the most appropriate song to open a show with in the history of rock & roll.
Posted by: Russ from Winterset at January 09, 2006 07:37 AM (M7kiy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"The White House Cookbook": Bread, Part One
For all manner of yeasty, doughy stuff---including how to make your own yeast---take the jump.
The husband says all you home brewers will probably want to pay attention to the bit on how to make your own yeast.
more...
Posted by: Kathy at
08:10 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1984 words, total size 11 kb.
January 07, 2006
I Really Like My New Landlord
Because he bought us, his favorite tenants, a gift card to
this place for Christmas.
(CAN YOU FREAKIN' BELIEVE IT??? THERE ARE GOOD LANDLORDS OUT THERE! THEY'RE NOT AN EXTINCT SPECIES! HURRAH!)
The restaurant is large and airy and is, quite literally, within stumbling distance from the Cake Eater pad. The booze is good. The food is even better. The people watching is excellent.
The dessert rules as well. (Apple spice cake with creme anglaise. Mmmmm)
And they have quotes on the wall.
My favorite?
I like the French. They taste like chicken.
---Hannibal Lecter
How can you not love a restaurant brave enough to quote Hannibal the Cannibal?
Posted by: Kathy at
08:48 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What a lovely thing to do. Makes this cynical NY'er think you're paying too much in rent, however.
Posted by: Random Penseur at January 08, 2006 05:39 AM (fWrQ6)
2
I'm assuming they serve fava beans.
And a nice chianti.
Posted by: The Random Yak at January 10, 2006 12:28 PM (dsGTv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
College Wasn't a Waste After All
You Have Your PhD in Men
|

You understand men almost better than anyone.
You accept that guys are very different, and you read signals well.
Work what you know about men, and your relationships will be blissful.
|
{hat tip: Cal Tech Girl}
Posted by: Kathy at
12:03 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Same here, though it was pretty easy to figure out the answers they wanted.
Posted by: Paula at January 08, 2006 08:11 AM (gOF1b)
2
Ooooh I'm so swiping this.
Posted by: agent bedhead at January 08, 2006 02:50 PM (xV63t)
3
It's odd, I know, but I apparently understand men well too!
Except that, um, sometimes, even when we're looking right at you, we're still not paying attention.
Posted by: andy at January 08, 2006 10:08 PM (llVZH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 06, 2006
Damned if You Do...
Damned if you don't.
CHARLES Kennedy put his political life on the line last night, admitting to a serious drink problem and calling an election, in a gamble that could see him sacked as Liberal Democrat leader.
After weeks of damaging speculation about his position, he was forced into an unprecedented public confession after the emergence of hard evidence that he had received medical treatment for alcohol misuse.
The scale of his colleagues' unhappiness with Mr Kennedy also became clear. Some 11 members of his front-bench have signed a letter calling for him to resign, and had planned to present it to him on Monday.
The twin revelations forced the Lib Dem leader into a desperate gamble, when he admitted he had repeatedly lied about his problem.
"Over the past 18 months, I have been coming to terms with, and seeking to cope with, a drink problem," Mr Kennedy said in a statement at his party's London headquarters. "I've sought professional help, and I believe today that this issue is essentially resolved.
"People close to me know that this has been a struggle," he said, insisting he had not had a drink for the past two months.
Within hours, several senior MPs who had been seen as possible challengers praised their leader's bravery and honesty in making his statement and said they would not stand against him.
But for all its dignity, Mr Kennedy's admission exposes him to grave political risk. Until yesterday, he had always denied having a drink problem and disputed suggestions that he'd had to seek medical help as a result. Now, he has admitted lying about his condition and offered opponents several opportunities to attack his character and integrity. {...}
Welcome to the Wide, Wonderful World of Alcoholism, my devoted Cake Eater Readers.
Mr. Kennedy's problems, woeful though they may be, are the same as any other alcoholic's, but with a bigger plot twist. Most alcoholics do try to keep their problem a secret; they try to hide it from the world, but in Mr. Kennedy's case, well, he's a politician: you can't hide things from the world. As a politician, you don't receive any measure of privacy, so people who don't buy your story about not having a drink problem deliberately seek to out you to the world---a world they know won't approve of you and your problem. Then they label you a "liar" because you tried to keep your problem private---because you know the stigma your problem carries---and you think telling the truth isn't an option.
Is the word "Ouroborous" ringing a bell here, kids?
No one can win in such a situation. No one. And we're all the worse for it.
UPDATED: And he quit. Go freakin' figure.
Posted by: Kathy at
09:57 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 463 words, total size 3 kb.
1
And there's another Kennedy that kept popping into my brain while reading.
But he'll never admit anything, much less a personal fault.
Posted by: Margi at January 06, 2006 10:17 AM (nwEQH)
2
A Kennedy that drinks????
Surely you jest.
Posted by: phin at January 06, 2006 11:06 AM (Xvpen)
3
How quaint -- a place where alcoholics are considered unsuited to high public office. Obviously not Massachusetts, eh?
Posted by: Bob at January 06, 2006 01:24 PM (yMzz+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 05, 2006
"The White House Cookbook": Facts Worth Knowing, Part Four
parts
one,
two and
three.
Take the jump for the absolute last of the facts worth knowing!
more...
Posted by: Kathy at
11:57 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1301 words, total size 8 kb.
Logic Breadcrumbs
Hmmm.
NORFOLK, Va. — Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson suggested Thursday that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's stroke was divine punishment for "dividing God's land."
"God considers this land to be his," Robertson said on his TV program "The 700 Club." "You read the Bible and he says `This is my land,' and for any prime minister of Israel who decides he is going to carve it up and give it away, God says, `No, this is mine.'"
Sharon, who ordered Israel's withdrawal from Gaza last year, suffered a severe stroke on Wednesday.
In Robertson's broadcast from his Christian Broadcasting Network in Virginia Beach, the evangelist said he had personally prayed about a year ago with Sharon, whom he called "a very tender-hearted man and a good friend." He said he was sad to see Sharon in this condition.
He also said, however, that in the Bible, the prophet Joel "makes it very clear that God has enmity against those who 'divide my land.'"
Sharon "was dividing God's land and I would say woe unto any prime minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the EU (European Union), the United Nations, or the United States of America," Robertson said.{...}
So, according to Robertson's logic, if I took Robertson out, I could claim God wanted me to do it because He was mad at Pat for all his idiotic statements. Because there's some bit in the Bible---God only knows where it is---about not listening to false prophets and God just wanted to mete out some justice and I was His vessel.
Right?
{hat tip: Everyone's Favorite Commie Pinko}
Posted by: Kathy at
10:38 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 273 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I like it! Can I help, huh? That way I can be God's vessel too?? No point you get all the praise!
Posted by: Ally at January 06, 2006 09:10 AM (ZnGgh)
2
It seems to me God's not particularly hindered by such idiots. Still, isn't it about time we Christians turn to Pat Robertson and all shouted in unison, "Would you just shut-the-eff-up?"
Love Scott Ott's take --
http://www.scrappleface.com/?p=2129
Posted by: Bob at January 06, 2006 01:41 PM (yMzz+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Dining and Dashing
The husband was finally able to visit his preferred cigar vendor yesterday.
The branch shop the husband used to visit was shut down recently due to decreased sales because of the increase in tobacco taxation health impact fees, so he had to visit the main shop downtown. He finally got this done, and because it was above freezing yesterday afternoon, the husband and I decided to go for a walk after we bought our Powerball ticket.
So, we've purchased what we think, of course, will be the winner and we're meandering our way through Cake Eater downtown when we come upon the Grandmothers for Peace. Every Wednesday, these women take up real estate on corners in Cake Eater downtown and flash signs that read "End the Occupation," or "Peace" or "Out of Iraq Now" to the passing traffic. Some people honk. Most drive by in silence. If it's warmer, some people yell obscenities. The husband---now happily smoking his cigar in the chilly, early evening air---and I avoid these women on two different corners as we cross the street. I keep my mouth shut and keep walking. Suddenly I notice I'm all alone. (It's Minnesota and it's chilly outside: you keep your head down.)
The husband had left me. To go and "chat" with one of the Grandmas.
As I was about fifteen feet beyond him and I couldn't hear what he said to them.
But I did see how they responded to whatever it was he said.
They stuck their protest signs up in such a way as to ward him off, like he was a disease. And they did it like they were little kids. One of the women was agitated and started waving her sign in front of the husband's face. After a moment's conversation, he turned and walked away.
He caught up with me a moment later and I asked him what he said to have them respond in such a way. He replied that he'd simply said that ten thousand little girls in Iraq now get to go to school.
How bloody childish can you get? Did she say anything? No. Did she tell the husband she was glad to hear his opinion, even if she disagreed with it? No. She waved her sign in his face. As if he was a vampire and it was a bulb of garlic meant to ward him off.
Which leads me to this thought, my devoted Cake Eater readers: in the restaurant of life, pacifists dine and dash. They're thieves. They eat the good food, they drink the good wine, they enjoy the ambience of the restaurant, but when the tab comes to the table, they get up and run because they won't pay the bill. It's not that they can't pay the bill; it's that they won't. They've made a conscious choice to say, hey, I love all that society has to offer, but I love it so much more than the average person, I won't pay for it because I believe it should all be free. And then runs out the door before someone can stop them.
Oh, sure, theoretically they're allowed. They're allowed to say all they want, until their faces turn blue and their tongues fall out. That's the beauty of free speech. But most of us realize that freedom isn't free. It never has been and it never will be. Freedom requires sacrifice and these pacifists, these Grandmothers for Peace, will never be willing to make any sacrifice to serve the greater good. It's not because they can't make the sacrifice; it's because they won't make the sacrifice. They want everything good, but they don't want to pay for it. They're freeloaders. They dine and dash.
How well do you think that goes over with the waitstaff?
Posted by: Kathy at
05:38 PM
| Comments (24)
| Add Comment
Post contains 639 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Damn, lady.
When you hit a nail on the head, you hit it square.
Well said.
Posted by: Christina at January 05, 2006 06:48 PM (zJsUT)
2
I'm following Christina because she is awesome.
Take Care
Michael
Posted by: Michael at January 05, 2006 07:48 PM (QNHC7)
3
Well done, to you & yours!
Posted by: Mom at January 05, 2006 08:14 PM (U2aLU)
4
Agreed. and linked. Very well stated.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at January 05, 2006 08:57 PM (0fZB6)
5
Her via Christina, and I have to say this was an awesome post.
Posted by: Theresa at January 05, 2006 09:07 PM (RzGwM)
Posted by: Kate at January 05, 2006 10:25 PM (XargM)
7
wow. well done, Kathy; well done
Posted by: amelie at January 05, 2006 10:49 PM (og1il)
8
Great analogy, Kathy!
When I was attending Army Ranger School, I met a former Vietnam P.O.W. I asked him why he was going through ranger training after spending six years as the guest of Ho Chi Minh. He laughed, "Piece o' cake."
His point wasn't really that ranger school was mere purgatory compared to the hell of the Hanoi Hilton, but that he was there because he saw it as his duty to continue his stand against tyranny. He'd seen the worst our enemies can do and he'd come away more determined. He could easily handle missing a little sleep and few meals.
The troops we now have serving in Afghanistan and Iraq are made of that same stuff.
Posted by: Bob at January 05, 2006 11:27 PM (kKI/g)
9
Sounds like the group of ladies that show up on Division Street in St. Cloud!
Am I close?
Alexandria Republican
Posted by: Retired Spy at January 05, 2006 11:54 PM (AaKND)
10
Might be a different branch. Cake Eater Land=Edina
Posted by: Kathy at January 06, 2006 12:00 AM (hbcMs)
11
Awesome! Just perfectly said!
Posted by: Oddybobo at January 06, 2006 08:18 AM (6Gm0j)
12
Bravo!
Excellent analogy.
Posted by: David M. at January 06, 2006 09:00 AM (6+obf)
13
More and more in this world there are takers rather than givers. A sad truth.
Posted by: Dishonorable Schoolboy at January 06, 2006 09:27 AM (lVJQr)
14
The waitstaff can't help but become bitter...
Very well said, Kathy.
Posted by: That 1 Guy at January 06, 2006 10:46 AM (lfQya)
15
You just have to wonder what argument they would make to someone who has been over there. All three of my boys that have been in Iraq say that they would go back, that they made a difference there.
Posted by: Raging Mom at January 06, 2006 11:00 AM (L+bvJ)
16
MaÂ’am,
I am sorry to be late to the table but thank you for your words. My son fought in the Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq, and now faces another deployment to Iraq and he is not yet 35 years old. My blood BOILS, even as a firm believer in free speech, to hear and see the reactions of those not willing to see that freedom is NOT free and has never been free.
Posted by: Edd at January 06, 2006 12:28 PM (73qGm)
17
Your husband is a rock star. That was brilliant. I am going to borrow it and use it where and whenever I can. In our little town, there is always favorable coverage of the whackos out with their signs on the main bridge once a month. My kids are always excited to see the "barking moonbats" (they'd like to visit them in their caves one day but I forbid it) because I let them roll the windows down and give 'em all a thumbs down.
Next time I'm going to park and share your husband's observation. Pithy and brilliant.
I love it.
Posted by: RP at January 06, 2006 03:16 PM (LlPKh)
18
Oh my G-d! I surfed in here from RP's (a good friend) and I have never heard such an astoundingingly good parallel - The dine-and-dash pacifists!!!!!
Good show, and your husband was dead on in his ppoint about the Iraqi girls.
Posted by: Mark at January 08, 2006 08:43 PM (7S7CC)
19
When did you serve, Kathy?
Your husband is clueless. Girls were already given an education in secular Iraq. Now that you've paved the way for a theocracy, that'll soon change.
Raging mom:
"You just have to wonder what argument they would make to someone who has been over there. All three of my boys that have been in Iraq say that they would go back, that they made a difference there."
They sure have made a difference. They've liberated more than a hundred thousand Iraqis from their lives, destroyed the infrastructure, created an insurgency that makes daily life hellish and locked up and abused more citizens than even bad old Saddam managed to. Iraq wasn't a paradise but it's now a basketcase.
Posted by: Dr Z at January 09, 2006 01:38 AM (LwmfQ)
20
Wow, 18 comments before the trolls came out to play.
Posted by: MRN aka "The Husband" at January 09, 2006 07:47 AM (hbcMs)
21
My fault, MRN, he followed the link from my site. Apologies, and bear in mind that "Dr. Zen" is an anti-American, anti-Semitic Brit who finds it sporting to call others "racist" for supporting our (and his) troops and Israel.
Posted by: Mark at January 09, 2006 08:22 PM (7S7CC)
22
No worries Mark, I've been on the Internet a long time, and trolls are nothing new.
However, for a guy calling himself "Dr. Zen", he certainly contains quite a bit of vitriol. In fact, allow me to quote Zen Master Dahui (as translated by Thomas Cleary): There are intellectual professionals who think they know everything but Zen, so they call over a couple of incompetent old monks, give them a meal, and have them say whatever comes into their minds. The 'intellectuals' then write this babble down and use it to judge everyone else. They trade sayings and call this 'Zen encounter',
imagining they have got the advantage if they have got the last word.
They don't even know it if they happen to run into real perceptives. Even if they do notice the real ones, these intellectuals are not really sure and will not seek understanding from the teachers. They just
seek approval as before. Then when the teachers demonstrate the real developmental impact of Zen in the midst of all sorts of situations, the intellectuals are afraid to approach.
Posted by: MRN aka "The Husband" at January 09, 2006 11:23 PM (hbcMs)
23
I apologize for joining the discussion very late -- I just found this post.
In your analogy, you equate freedom with a collective meal we have all enjoyed. You equate the grandmothers with diners who have eaten the meal, but then skipped on the tab. A few questions if I might:
1. For what freedom of ours have the grandmothers refused to pay by protesting the war in Iraq? How, specifically, would you and I and the grandmothers be less free if our military weren't in Iraq today?
2. I would guess that most people would probably judge that some wars are worth the cost and others are not. That seems like a modest proposition. This suggests that, at least sometimes, war is not in the best interest of a nation, and the grandmother's postion is valid, correct even. Have you not cheated the debate by failing to establish the merits of this war before you accuse the opposition of being unpatriotic freeloaders? In fact, that's the point, isn't it? You've skipped over the hard part (i.e. establishing why the war in Iraq is in our national interest, how the benefits of girls in school, Saddam out of power, etc. are worth the real costs in blood, treasure, destruction, etc.).
3. There are at least a few military veterans who agree with the grandmothers about the poor cost/benefits of the war in Iraq.
http://www.ivaw.net/
Are they also thieves in your diner?
Posted by: Rob at March 01, 2006 11:46 AM (b07Eo)
24
Not all sacrifice for freedom is military in nature, cf. Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., etc.
Posted by: Osaka at March 02, 2006 12:05 AM (mIaSi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
85kb generated in CPU 0.034, elapsed 0.1162 seconds.
65 queries taking 0.0951 seconds, 264 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.