May 26, 2005
Maybe the first rule of plot implausibility is that you don't talk about plot implausibility.
Then again, although I've seen this film several times, I've never actually seen the very end of it, so perhaps there's some big chunk of explanation that I've simply missed.
But not knowing what the hell I'm talking about has never barred me from opining before, so I don't really see why it should start now.
So here goes:
I can see where, if coming out of a bar and spotting two guys beating the crap out of each other, I would be intrigued. And I can see where, once I got an idea of what was going on, I might be tempted to join in - writers as diverse as Hemingway and Wodehouse have written about the sublime meaning of boxing. And once I joined in, if one of the ring-leaders started serving up helpings of dorm room bull session anti-Establishment cant, I might be inclined to listen to them. My crew coach in college was a past-master at this kind of thing. And once I started listening to said cant from said ring-leader, yes, I can see how I might eventually be converted into an econo-terrorism zealot.
But if I come out of that bar and see one guy beating the crap out of himself? Well.....I don't think I'm going to look on him as potential Fuhrer material. Know what I mean?
Posted by: Robert at
07:18 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 259 words, total size 1 kb.
51 queries taking 0.1083 seconds, 145 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.