June 01, 2004
Question is, what does "taking
Question is, what does "taking something at face value" mean to General Omar el-Bashir?
What the hell does this mean? And by that I mean what does it mean in reality,
because Bashir is supporting the militias right now. How can he switch
sides now and more importantly, why would he want to? What interest
does it serve?
He's caving to international pressure? I don't think so. This guy has
waged war for twenty years in the south and only caved to international
pressure after the US lobbed a few cruise missles into Khartoum which
demolished an aspirin factory, and President Bush gave a short speech
on the evening of 9/11 declaring that we would go after the state
sponsors of terrorism. Those moves told Bashir we meant business and he replied appropriately and got his butt to the bargaining table.
In other words, this move isn't because Kofi told him he had to protect the people under fire in Darfur.
What's scared him into acting, or at least declaring he's going to act? Furthermore, can we take him at his word? (Which I don't think we can.)
I'll be damned if I know what it means other than the obvious at this moment in time.
{Insert much head scratching here}
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
KHARTOUM, Sudan - Sudan's president, under international
pressure to end killings of civilians in the western Darfur region,
said the armed forces will disarm the Arab militias blamed for what the
United Nations (news - web sites) has called a humanitarian crisis.
President Omar el-Bashir said in a statement Saturday said he was
ordering a "complete mobilization" of all Sudanese army and security
forces to disarm all Darfur's warring parties, including the janjaweed
— nomadic Arab militia that the government has been accused of
supporting. Fighting between Arab militias and the black African
population has killed thousands of people and forced more than 1
million to flee their homes. International rights groups say the
government has backed the Arab militia in an ethnic cleansing campaign
against the African villagers. The government has strongly denied the
accusations, saying the conflict was a result of tribal conflicts over
land and water resources.
What the hell does this mean? And by that I mean what does it mean in reality,
because Bashir is supporting the militias right now. How can he switch
sides now and more importantly, why would he want to? What interest
does it serve?
He's caving to international pressure? I don't think so. This guy has
waged war for twenty years in the south and only caved to international
pressure after the US lobbed a few cruise missles into Khartoum which
demolished an aspirin factory, and President Bush gave a short speech
on the evening of 9/11 declaring that we would go after the state
sponsors of terrorism. Those moves told Bashir we meant business and he replied appropriately and got his butt to the bargaining table.
In other words, this move isn't because Kofi told him he had to protect the people under fire in Darfur.
What's scared him into acting, or at least declaring he's going to act? Furthermore, can we take him at his word? (Which I don't think we can.)
I'll be damned if I know what it means other than the obvious at this moment in time.
{Insert much head scratching here}
Posted by: Kathy at
02:27 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 371 words, total size 2 kb.
15kb generated in CPU 0.0115, elapsed 0.0692 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.0632 seconds, 143 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
49 queries taking 0.0632 seconds, 143 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








